Mysterious Org[]
Well yes, we dont know much about it but how could it be a rival to umbrella if umbrella doesn't exist anymore? NEO-Umbrella, its clearly a replacement/revival so stop putting "possible this" and "possible that". Neo means New. It litterally translates into "New Umbrella", so my information needs to be put back.
Derek and Ada are clearly working for them -- that info needs to returned as well.Werebereus 22:16, June 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Actually "Neo" can also mean "different". It is neither the rival company nor does Ada work for them. While Simmons is likely the mastermind, there is always a possibility that even he is a pawn. Carla Radames, Ada's doppleganger, is the one that works for them. It is likely not a real organization, just a fake created by Simmons in order to place the blame for the bioterrorism attacks on, while framing the real Ada Wong as its leader. News Bot 22:20, June 6, 2012 (UTC)
- But Carlas not a DoppleGanger, shes the woman in the picture an again that woman is not a clone. So your theory is in the garbage.Werebereus 10:35, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
- That image of Carla is before she enters a chrysalid cocoon. After she comes out of it (a picture of which is also in that image you mention), she resembles Ada. She's a physical double/doppleganger who is physically remodeled through the use of the C-Virus to resemble Ada so that they can frame her, not a clone. Do your research. News Bot 12:55, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Tch, source?Werebereus 03:45, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Already stated elsewhere. News Bot 05:27, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Tch, source?Werebereus 03:45, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
- That image of Carla is before she enters a chrysalid cocoon. After she comes out of it (a picture of which is also in that image you mention), she resembles Ada. She's a physical double/doppleganger who is physically remodeled through the use of the C-Virus to resemble Ada so that they can frame her, not a clone. Do your research. News Bot 12:55, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
- But Carlas not a DoppleGanger, shes the woman in the picture an again that woman is not a clone. So your theory is in the garbage.Werebereus 10:35, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting. I think we should start locking these new articles for the timebeing, however. They may start attracting highly-speculative edits soon.-- Forerunner 22:24, June 6, 2012 (UTC)
reopening the surviving original umbrella facilities[]
why didn't Neo Umbrella reopen the surviving umbrella facilities like the russian facility to provoke anti bioterrorist organizations? Dragon146 (talk) 15:41, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Every Umbrella facility was known and if anyone caught it re-opening shit would hit the fan, Neo-Umbrella likely wanted to be primarily unknown until the attacks happened.—Riley Heligo 15:44, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
- There's also the problem with Umbrella's facilities being outdated. So, even if they did happen undiscovered facility, they might have to do tons of work to clear out the machinery; re-wire the facility; check for any structural damages, etc. It would have potentially been a waste of resources - building a new facility would guarantee that everything's safe and modern. It's like Spain's apartment blocks; they're torn down early in their lives and replaced with more up-to-date buildings, because constant upkeep would be more expensive in the long run and it would satisfy less customers/tenants. -- Forerunner 16:47, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
- There's also the small matter of Neo-Umbrella having NOTHING TO DO with the original corporation. They would have no access to any previous Umbrella facility.MrsPickles1 (talk) 12:20, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think the initial user (who commented a year ago) was arguing that Neo Umbrella is the legitimate successor; just that they could take advantage of any left over equipment to "provoke" organizations such as the BSAA (I don't know if he meant confusing them with the production of Umbrella products, or just by having bioweapons coming out of those initial facilities again). Though, we already responded that there are too many flaws in his idea for there to be any point.-- Forerunner 12:31, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- There's also the small matter of Neo-Umbrella having NOTHING TO DO with the original corporation. They would have no access to any previous Umbrella facility.MrsPickles1 (talk) 12:20, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Is there some kind of rule that says we can't comment on things that are over a certain timespan? And it certainly reads, as do all the responses, that Neo-Umbrella is implied to be some kind of second coming of Umbrella so hey let's dig out the keys and go re-open all our old haunts.MrsPickles1 (talk) 12:42, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
- We can probably just blame their organization's name - the whole point is to remind people of Umbrella and get them asking "are they successors to Umbrella?", "is it just to scare us and nothing more?". Yeah, when a blog or talkpage topic has gone ignored for over a month, it's considered "dead" (either everyone lost interest and stopped talking, or someone "won" a debate), and there's little point in reviving it since the original commenter (Dragon146) is long gone.-- Forerunner 12:51, April 27, 2014 (UTC)